The essence of the present Gaza conflict is rooted not only in the intricacies of the ongoing struggle but also in the crucial imperative that it creates for a peaceful resolution of the Palestine-Israel conflict.
Lord Stone serves on the board of the Next Century Foundation. As a senior Jewish member of the House of Lords, he has shared his perspectives and recommendations. He highlighted potential avenues for peace-building that could provide grounds for optimism regarding a secure future for the region. His viewpoint is shaped by a profound dedication to the relentless pursuit of peace.
Here is the published speech which is a response to the King’s speech in which the UK government laid out its agenda. The text of Lord Stone’s intervention follows below:
My Lords, the gracious Speech made scant reference to the Middle East conflict but what it said was even-handed. Your Lordships may feel that what I am about to suggest is unrealistic and too ambitious. However, the Minister, the noble Lord, Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon, has been very positive in support when I outlined these ideas previously. If anyone can see it through, he can.
As someone deeply tied to my Jewish heritage, the ongoing conflict in my other homeland, Israel, deeply troubles me. However, my concern extends to those affected in both Israel and the whole of Palestine. In supporting the cause for peace and stability in the Middle East, rather than take sides in this debate, I will offer suggestions on how to move forward positively, peacefully and with compassion and respect for all.
Palestinian Recognition
There is a need, first, for hope and respect for Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. We need to arrive at a position where the nations of the world, including the United Kingdom, are ready to acknowledge and recognise the state of Palestine alongside Israel.
Secondly, we should agree to create a long-term plan for those two nations, Palestine and Israel, to enjoy a future where everyone benefits. We in the United Kingdom can help as an honest broker, by hosting a month-long conference to talk about a positive future rather than argue about the past. We could invite parties here to discuss this in a positive, constructive and pragmatic way, with the UK playing a co-ordinating role. A safe and appropriate location for such a conference would be here, in the Palace of Westminster, and/or Highgrove and/or St James’s Palace.
Gaza Port
Then, for example, Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia could work with Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Israel, Jordan, the Palestinians and other countries in the region to build a huge port in Gaza, linked to Cyprus, so that Palestine becomes the Hong Kong of the region and all its citizens have employment and become wealthy. Then, together, these countries—Egypt, Palestine, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and others—having become partners in this huge, positive construction project, can work together to develop the Sinai peninsula as an enormous solar energy park and a source of clean energy for the planet. It would move the region from oil and gas income to massive solar energy profits. This partnership could build peace, co-operation and green energy on a vast scale, which the world needs.
Climb the Mountain
Also, it has been suggested that, since Mount Sinai is sacred to Jews, Muslims and Christians, we could invite leaders from all faiths to walk slowly up the mount from different directions and meet at the top, and they could declare that they all worship one God. Then, the area around could become a peace park, with hotels and wonderful venues for vacations, meditation, co-operation, conversation and exchanges of love and wisdom. Several organisations with which I am involved would be happy to help facilitate such a conference and further the projects that I have outlined over the long term.
In an earlier discussion regarding the establishment of a port for Gaza, Lord Stone reminded the British Government that Nabil Shaath had proposed a plan for the revitalization of Gaza Port, involving a connected port in Cyprus. This proposal hinged on Saudi Arabia recognizing both Israel and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. While acknowledging the substantial costs associated with such a significant initiative, Lord Stone suggested that private sector investments and potential contributions from other governments, possibly including the USA, could play a role. However, he emphasized that Saudi Arabia would likely be the primary shareholder in this venture.
5 Responses
the element of democracy has to be included and used.
Happy to add you to our email lists if you wish. The element of democracy would of course be delightful but the Western powers now oppose democracy for Palestine as they cannot be trusted not to elect Hamas or similar radicals – and that’s a red line for the West. Presidential elections might occur. Parliamentary elections for Palestine are not an option sadly.
I read the plan thoroughly, it was obvious that Lord Stone forgot the Saudi Initiative in 2002 ..
consedering the war that is ongoing in Gaza .. and Israel not paying any regard to international law, the humaniterian law, not even to US adivce regarding the increase number of killed children and civilians ..
I believe that the start of any such plan is the ceasefire .. with a time frame to
End the occupation from the West bank and Gaza As per International legality 242-338
Which mean that 750,000 settlers must get out of the settlements to have contiuity of geographical land for a viable State.. (this way you are implementing the Saudi initiative as per what Saudi requested in 2002 and offered in return to have normalization of relations as well as an Israeli embassy in Jedda ..
I would add .. why not give their houses as a good will gesture for 1948 refugees who were forced out of their homes. ( pls. wathc the NetFlex documentary Tantoura ) thus speed the healing time between the two people .. as well as the Arab public in each Arabic & Muslim State …..
An immediate recognition of the Palestinian State ..
Then Saudi – Egypt and all other Arab countries will be happy to take part in the economical recovery of Palestine …and Israel can have secured and recognised borders .
I don’t think he forgot the Saudi plan. There are two separate but related issues. One is the future governance of Palestine. The other is a peace process.
with all my respect to our Dear William ..
Governance of Palestine ..
The first step is a bridge from Gaza to Jerusalem .. which takes onely one hour to connect both sides ..
there are many new qualified young leaders in Palestine .. who can easily form a new government ..by election
ONE YEAR ONLY to have the two steps implemented with full withdrawal from both areas .. NO MORE peace process when you have the sincerety to implement without any more deviding of land as per the Oslo agreement and settemnts expansion .. ..
The seperation of the two people is the best thing you do to protect them from each other ..
On September 13, 1993, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas signed a Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, commonly referred to as the “Oslo Accord,” at the White House.